Seed ferns and the origin of angiosperms

By J. Doyle. 2006

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Early evolution of angiosperm pollen as inferred from molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses (2005, background): “These results imply that the search for relatives of angiosperms and steps in their origin must concentrate on fossil seed plants (Doyle 2001, 2004).”
Inference of higher-order conifer relationships from a multi-locus plastid data set (2008, background): “1997), is less problematic from a morphological perspective (e.g., Mundry and Stützel 2004; Doyle 2005).”
Integrating Molecular Phylogenetic and Paleobotanical Evidence on Origin of the Flower (2008, methodology): “One of my goals in Doyle (2006) was to evaluate whether the conflict between molecular and morphological evidence on the relationships of angiosperms and Gnetales was as strong as it seems.”
Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta (2007, background): “…in xylem (assuming non-homology with angiosperm vessels), compound microsporangiate strobili, striate pollen (modified to echinate in Gnetum; Yao & al., 2004), micropylar tube, apical meristem with one tunica layer (Doyle & Donoghue, 986a,b, 992; Crane, 988; Rothwell & Serbet, 994; Doyle, 2006).”