Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae)
By M. L. Matthews, P. K. Endress. 2005
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d993bce311dc6fc1f2a14fb809ae709b0e52699e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- M. L. Matthews
- P. K. Endress
- J. Doyle
- L. R. Craene
- Pamela S. Soltis
- D. Soltis
- Chelsea D. Specht
- M. Bartlett
In Molecular Biology
- M. L. Matthews
- P. K. Endress
- J. Doyle
- L. R. Craene
- Pamela S. Soltis
- D. Soltis
- Chelsea D. Specht
- M. Bartlett
Citations in the corpus
- Elaborate petals and staminodes in eudicots: Diversity, function, and evolution (2006, background): “Recently, the diversity of petals and its systematic significance was addressed in some orders of rosids (Matthews and Endress 2002, 2004, 2005a, b).”
- Flower Structure and Trends of Evolution in Eudicots and Their Major Subclades1 (2010, background): “…Kunth and Dipentodon Dunn were previ- ously placed in Celastraceae, but floral structure of Perrottetia showed it to be clearly out of place there (Matthews & Endress, 2005a), and Gerrardina Oliv. was placed in Flacourtiaceae (Malpighiales) before it was recognized as constituting a separate…”