Blackbox Kriging: Spatial Prediction Without Specifying Variogram Models
By Ronald P. Barry, Jay M. Ver Hoef. 1996
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrew Gordon Wilson
- David B. Dunson
- David M. Blei
- Zoubin Ghahramani
- Athanasios Kottas
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yoshua Bengio
- Alan E. Gelfand
Citations in the corpus
- Gaussian Process Regression Networks (2011, background): “The results for LMC, CMOGP, MFITC, MPITC, and MDTC are reproduced from Alvarez and Lawrence (2011).”
- A Moving Average Approach for Spatial Statistical Models of Stream Networks (2010, background): “KEY WORDS: Euclidean distance; Geostatistics; Kernel convolution; Spatial autocorrelation; Spatial linear model.”
- Process (2020, methodology): “We adopt the tail-up spatial model [32, 33, 34] to capture the spatial correlation between two locations u, v ∈ K at time t denoted as αt(u, v).”
- Bayesian Nonparametric Spatial Modeling With Dirichlet Process Mixing (2005, methodology): “In this regard, there are the nonparametric variogram (cid:12)tting approaches, e.g., Shapiro and Botha (1991) and Barry and Ver Hoef (1996).”
- Space and Space-Time Modeling using Process Convolutions (2002, background): “# generate K matricies for each scale K1_matrix(NA,ncol=m1[1],nrow=n) for(i in 1:m1[1]) K1[,i]_dnorm(s,mean=w[[1]][i],sd=sdkern[1])”