Bayesian Nonparametric Spatial Modeling With Dirichlet Process Mixing
By Alan E. Gelfand, Athanasios Kottas, S. MacEachern. 2005
409 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Chemistry, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e24622199fca470b9cf610d4f13dc6f4db993333
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David B. Dunson
- David M. Blei
- Lawrence Carin
- Alan E. Gelfand
- Athanasios Kottas
- Samuel J. Gershman
- Abel Rodríguez
- Enrique ter Horst
In Environmental Chemistry
- David B. Dunson
- Michele Guindani
- David M. Blei
- Mark F. J. Steel
- Samuel J. Gershman
- Jim E. Griffin
- Alan E. Gelfand
- Fernando A. Quintana
In Environmental Engineering
- David B. Dunson
- Alan E. Gelfand
- Mark F. J. Steel
- Ting-Li Su
- Raquel Menezes
- Michele Guindani
- David M. Blei
- Samuel J. Gershman
Citations in the corpus
- The Matrix Stick-Breaking Process (2008, methodology): “The DDP formulation of MacEachern (1999, 2000), as implemented by De Iorio et al. (2004) and Gelfand, Kottas, and MacEachern (2005), relies on assuming fixed probability weights, π = {πh,h = 1, . . . ,∞}, while allowing the atoms to vary across probability measures in the collection according to a…”
- Hybrid Dirichlet mixture models for functional data (2009, methodology): “The priors for μ, σ2 and σ20 are chosen following Gelfand et al. (2005).”
- On the Support of MacEachern’s Dependent Dirichlet Processes and Extensions (2012, methodology): “2010), spatial modeling (Gelfand et al. 2005), functional data (Dunson and Herring 2006), time series (Caron et al.”
- Geostatistical inference under preferential sampling (2010, methodology): “These approaches could be extended to the setting that is presented by Diggle and his colleagues by replacing the Gaussian spatial model for S with a non-Gaussian spatial model (e.g. Gelfand et al. (2005), Griffin and Steel (2006) and Reich and Fuentes (2007)).”
- The Nested Dirichlet Process (2008, methodology): “…this construction (where dependence is introduced only on the atoms) has been used by DeIorio, Müller, Rosner & MacEachern (2004) to create ANOVA-like models for densities, and by Gelfand, Kottas, and MacEachern (2005) to generate spatial processes that allow for nonnormality and nonstationarity.”
- Bayesian dynamic density estimation (2008, background): “2007b; Griffin and Steel 2007; Dunson 2006) or by introducing dependence in the elements of the stick-breaking representation of the distribution (MacEachern 1999; DeIorio et al. 2004; Gelfand et al. 2005; Griffin and Steel 2006; Rodriguez et al. 2008).”
- Bayesian density regression (2007, methodology): “De Iorio et al. (2004) used the dependent DP to produce an analysis-of-variance type of dependence structure, whereas Gelfand et al. (2005) applied the dependent DP to spatial modelling applications by using a Gaussian process for the atoms.”
- Bayesian Semiparametric Modelling in Quantile Regression (2009, background): “The DDP was developed by MacEachern (1999; 2000) as a non-parametric prior for a stochastic process of random distributions; these distributions are dependent but such that, at each index value, the distribution is a DP (see also De Iorio et al., 2004; Gelfand et al., 2005).”
- A Tutorial on Bayesian Nonparametric Models (2011, methodology): “One way to capture such dependencies in a BNP model is to make the base distribution G0 of the DP dependent on a location variable (Gelfand et al., 2005; Duan et al., 2007).”
- Order-Based Dependent Dirichlet Processes (2006, methodology): “Of particular relevance for this article is the nonparametric approach of Gelfand, Kottas, and MacEachern (2004), where the locations θ of the stick-breaking representation of a Dirichlet process are assumed to come from a Gaussian process.”
- Generalized spatial dirichlet process models (2007, methodology): “The spatial Dirichlet process introduced by Gelfand et al. (2005) produces a random spatial process which is neither Gaussian nor stationary.”