Interference and forgetting.

By B. Underwood. 1957

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

One-shot Learning with Memory-Augmented Neural Networks (2016, background): “However, when memory is not cleared between tasks, the MANN suffers from proactive interference, as seen in many studies of human memory and inference (Underwood, 1957).”
Buildup and Release from Proactive Interference - Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms. (2020, background): “…interference had been widely accepted as the major factor underlying episodic forgetting (e.g., Jenkins and Dallenbach, 1924; Skaggs, 1925), when Underwood (1957) published a seminal paper in which he demonstrated that memory failure is not always due to the detrimental effects of subsequent…”
Meta-Learning with Memory-Augmented Neural Networks (2016, background): “However, when memory is not cleared between tasks, the MANN suffers from proactive interference, as seen in many studies of human memory and inference (Underwood, 1957).”
Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition (2004, background): “b) Language information is modified under the influence of another language as predicted by Interference theory (Loftus, 1980; Underwood, 1957) which indicates that new information influences previous information (retroactive interference) that is similar in nature and vice versa (proactive interfer”
Remembered experiences and revisit intentions: A longitudinal study of safari park visitors (2016, background): “Research has shown that forgetting in long-term memory does not come about as a result of decay, but rather, more complex phenomena (Jenkins and Dallenbach, 1924; McGeoch, 1932), such as those explained via the psychological theories of interference (Underwood, 1957; Underwood and Postman, 1960) and”
Memory consolidation. (2015, background): “In the field of experimental psychology, new learning has long been thought to generate interference by creating competing associations linked to a retrieval cue, not by affecting the integrity of a fragile memory trace (e.g., Keppel, 1968; Underwood, 1957; Watkins & Watkins, 1975).”
A temporal ratio model of memory. (2007, methodology): “We examined PI in this two-dimensional model, again following the basic paradigm explored by Underwood (1957), although detailed data-fitting was not possible or appropriate given the variety of studies subsumed in the Underwood analysis.”
Memory for prices and the euro cash changeover: An analysis for cinema prices in Italy (2007, background): “The trace could have been removed by proactive inhibition (earlier memories supplanting more recent ones; Underwood 1957) or retroactive interference (forgetting old information due to new information; McGeoch and McDonald 1931, Slamecka 1960).”
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. (2004, background): “Early theories of verbal learning (McGeoch, 1932; Underwood, 1957) attempted to specify the conditions mediating retroactive and proactive interference.”
Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. (2011, background): “Thus, proactive interference refers to the poorer retention of material learned later, caused by prior learning (Underwood, 1957; see Crowder (1976) for a review).”
Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory tests (2000, methodology): “However, the experiment involved a large number of trials, and similar materials were presented across trials, thereby creating optimal conditions for the build-up of proactive interference ( Underwood, 1957;”
The critical role of retrieval processes in release from proactive interference (2013, background): “We expected to find buildup of PI in each of the single experiments, reflected in both decreased response totals and increased response latencies for the target items in the PI-condition relative to the no-PI condition (e.g., Underwood, 1957; Wixted & Rohrer, 1993).”