Does it Matter that we do not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches

788 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corporate social responsibility and developing countries (2011, background): “Laderchi et al. (2003) pointed out that while there is no consensus defi nition for poverty, defi nition matters.”
Multidimensional poverty and inequality (2014, positive): “Ruggeri Laderchi et al. (2003) compare empirical findings for the social exclusion and capability approaches.”
Subjective well-being poverty vs. Income poverty and capabilities poverty? (2006, background): “( 2003 ) examine and contrast four different approaches to the definition of poverty (not including the subjective well-being approach).”
Adverse Incorporation, Social Exclusion and Chronic Poverty (2007, background): “Thirdly, the social exclusion approach also involves a clear awareness of the multidimensionality of deprivation (de Haan, 1999, Ruggeri-Laderchi et al., 2003).”
Human Development: Definitions, Critiques, and Related Concepts (2010, background): “uk 53 Stewart, F. (1996). Basic needs, capabilities, and human development.”
Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index (2013, background): “Also, Ruggieri-Laderchi et al (2003) demonstrate empirical mismatches between direct and income poverty measures.”