Subjective well-being poverty vs. Income poverty and capabilities poverty?

By Geeta Kingdon, John Knight. 2006

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da50277fcc13b6fb1728d0b5ca92a08d4cd0df2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Relative Concerns of Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China (2012, background): “2See Graham and Pettinato (2002) on Peru and Russia; Kingdon and Knight (2006, 2007) and Bookwalter and Dalenberg (2010) on South Africa; Akay and Martinsson (2010) on Ethiopia; and Ravallion and Lokshin (2001, 2002) on Russia; see Graham (2005) for a helpful overview.”
Income, aspirations and the Hedonic Treadmill in a poor society (2012, background): “Kingdon and Knight (2006) have argued that, provided that the aggregation of expressed individual preferences is the criterion for evaluation, the estimation of subjective well-being functions offers an encompassing framework which yields weights for the valuation of income and various capabilities…”
Community, Comparisons and Subjective Well-being in a Divided Society (2007, background): “Nevertheless, Kingdon and Knight (2006) examine these issues and attempt to justify subjective well-being as a criterion for policy-making.”
The Determinants of Happiness of China’s Elderly Population (2012, background): “Recently the happiness in developing countries has been studied as well (see e.g., Graham and Felton (2005) on Latin American countries; Kingdon and Knight (2006) on South Africa; Rossi et al. (2007) on Uruguay; Selim (2008) on Turkey).”
Poor, or Just Feeling Poor? On Using Subjective Data in Measuring Poverty (2012, background): “Then equation (9) becomes: )( iiiiiiii XXXSW (11) 35 See, for example, the discussion in Kingdon and Knight (2006).”
Subjective Welfare, Isolation, and Relative Consumption (2008, background): “Recent evidence of this relationship is provided by Kingdon & Knight (2003) for China and by Lokshin, Umapathi & Paternostro (2003) for Madagascar.”
Subjective Well-Being in China, 2005-2010: The Role of Relative Income, Gender and Location (2015, methodology): “35 For a similar approach, see Kingdon and Knight (2006).”