The social psychology of morality : exploring the causes of good and evil

By A. Assor, Joshua D. Greene, Ilana Ritov, Shahar Ayal, Jonathan Haidt, Phillip R. Shaver, Roy F. Baumeister, Gilad Hirschberger, Linda J. Skitka, Paul Bloom and 15 more. 2012

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5745aa20d2df78362f9e09f3839fecf7ba19700

Citations in the corpus

• Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it (2013, unknown): “In this chapter we focus instead on an increasingly dominant alternative view, grounded in moral psychology and behavioral ethics, that suggests that individuals‟ morality is malleable rather than stable (cf., Ayal & Gino, 2011; Monin & Jordan, 2009).”
• Behavioral Ethics: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Moral Judgment and Dishonesty (2012, unknown): “…evidence for the malleability of morality comes from more recent research examining what people do when they are placed in situations in which they have the opportunity to behave unethically (e.g., by lying about their performance on a task) (see Ayal & Gino, 2011; Mazar, Amir, & Ariely, 2008).”
• A lifespan perspective on attachment and care for others: Empathy, altruism, and prosocial behavior (2016, unknown): “…of the topics encountered in the broader psychological literature on prosocial behavior—empathy, compassion, generosity, forgiveness, and altruism (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2010, 2012) —is quite natural, and in recent years it has been accomplished in studies of the prosocial behavior of children,…”
• Not Competent Enough to Know the Difference? Gender Stereotypes about Women's Ease of Being Misled Predict Negotiator Deception (2014, unknown): “Because agents can cite local social utility—the fact that their behavior benefited others—as one excuse for acting deceptively (Ayal & Gino, 2011), acting in one’s own capacity may reduce women’s deceit of other women.”
• From political opponents to enemies? The role of perceived moral distance in the animalistic dehumanization of the political outgroup (2016, unknown): “Individuals are credited with moral worth and are considered to deserve moral treatment “simply” by virtue of being human (Bandura, 1999; Haslam et al., 2012).”
• Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges (2018, unknown): “Moral dilemmas refer to situations in which AI systems need to choose between conflicting alternatives and “ no moral choice is without undesirable moral consequences ” (Ditto & Liu, 2012, p. 55).”
• Self-Serving Justifications (2015, unknown): “Ayal & Gino (2011) found that recalling bad deeds and asking for forgiveness from a higher entity led participants to behave more honestly than those who did not ask for forgiveness.”