Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings

By Sven Tischer, Lutz Hildebrandt. 2011

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5714756d5f51c0036f52d18a30410814324a775

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Elena Lvina
2. Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
3. Nadine Gatzert

In Marketing

1. Elena Lvina
2. Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
3. Nadine Gatzert

In Strategy and Management

1. Elena Lvina
2. Carol-Ann Tetrault Sirsly
3. Nadine Gatzert

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Corporate Reputation and Reputation Damaging Events on Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Literature (2015, background): “…stakeholder groups typically include customers, suppliers, (potential) employees, investors, and local communities (e.g. Fombrun and van Riel, 1997; Tischer and Hildebrandt, 2014).2 Reputations can differ among stakeholder groups as a firm can have, e.g., a good reputation among investors but a…”
• From Doing Good to Looking Even Better: The Dynamics of CSR and Reputation (2019, background): “…for something with someone” (p. 179) that Walker and Dyke (2014) test with a student sample, recent empirical research maintains the older definition (Tischer & Hildebrandt, 2014) and our use of a generalized reputation aligns with the broad cross section of stakeholder interests in CSR.”