The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes

By V. Yzerbyt, Olivier Corneille, C. Estrada. 2001

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5506a20cd15bd119dbd6072d083b8ebe8e4d377

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

If They Move in Sync, They Must Feel in Sync: Movement Synchrony Leads to Attributions of Rapport and Entitativity (2011, result): “However, the model where the effect of movement synchrony on entitativity is mediated by attributions of rapport is most in line with synchrony researchers’ theoretical assumptions about the relationship between movement synchrony, rapport, and entitativity (e.g., Bernieri, 1988; LaFrance, 1990; Mar”
Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations (2006, background): “There does appear to be a consensus that entitativity and natural kinds (or inalterability; a form of essentialism) are separate, albeit related, lay theories or subcomponents (e.g. Haslam et al., 2000; Yzerbyt et al., 2001; also see Rothbart & Taylor, 1992).”
Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective (2006, unknown): “Haslam, Hutchinson, & Grace, 1995 ; Yzerbyt, Corneille, & Estrada, 2001 ).”
How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework (2019, background): “…(stereotyping) of social-category stereotypes (Abelson et al., 1998; Crawford et al., 2002; Hamilton & Sherman, 1996; Spencer-Rodgers et al., 2007; Yzerbyt et al., 2001), but research in this area suffers from a lack of consensus (e.g., Hamilton, 2007) and has focused relatively little on to…”
Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories (2007, background): “Yzerbyt et al. (2001) manipulated essentialism by telling participants that two groups were distinguished either by different genetic markers or by the fact that they were waiting for different buses.”
Lay Theories of Essentialism (2006, background): “Importantly, these elements cover the two clusters of dimensions linked to entitativity: similarity and organization (Dasgupta et al., 1999; Gaertner & Schopler, 1998; Yzerbyt et al., 2001).”
Are Ethnic Groups Biological “Species” to the Human Brain? (2001, background): “An alternative hypothesis posits a smooth entitativity continuum (Hamilton and Sherman 1996, Hamilton, Sherman, and Lickel 1998, Yzerbyt, Rocher, and Schadron 1997, Yzerbyt, Rogier, and Fiske 1998, Yzerbyt, Corneille, and Estrada 2001).”