The PETTLEP Approach to Motor Imagery: A Functional Equivalence Model for Sport Psychologists

By P. Holmes, D. Collins. 2001

719 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4fc7c64e75fd083b3398e13bfadb04ac8ff8a76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability (2007, methodology): “…for valid and effective mental practice, as well as for a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in motor imagery (see the PETTLEP model, Holmes & Collins, 2001) However, it has been reported that the beneficial effects of motor imagery on motor performance are modulated by numerous…”
The role of working memory in sport (2010, methodology): “…several applied models have been put forth, such as the PETTLEP (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, and Perspective) (Holmes & Collins, 2001), the applied model of imagery use (Martin, Moritz, & Hall, 1999), and the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport (Guillot &…”
Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery (2008, positive): “This relationship is called " functional equivalence " (Holmes and Collins, 2001), even though the neural substrates mediating these different types of MI and those activated during motor performance of the same action are not totally overlapping (Ruby and Decety, 2001; Sirigu and Duhamel, 2001;…”
Perceptual Training in Soccer: An Imagery Intervention Study with Elite Players (2005, background): “…1999), how imagery affects performance (e.g., Driskell, Copper, & Moran, 1994) and how imagery interventions can be set up most efficiently (e.g., Holmes & Collins, 2001), the role of imagery in perceptual training programs for athletes has not yet been investigated (Williams & Grant, 1999;…”
Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions (2012, background): “While some researchers provided evidence that real-time MI is not the only way to achieve peak performance (O & Munroe-Chandler, 2008 ), and that slow, real-time, or fast imagery can be differentially used to achieve specific outcomes (O & Hall, 2009 ), others reported that the duration of mentall”
Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use (2008, methodology): “The multitude of methodological design combinations resulting from such inconsistencies may explain the opposing research findings (Goginsky & Collins, 1996; Holmes & Collins, 2001).”
The effect of PETTLEP imagery on strength performance (2009, methodology): “Holmes and Collins (2001) also argued that participants should hold any implements that would be held and adopt the same position as during physical practice to emphasise the physical nature of the imagery.”
The effects of imagery interventions in sports: a meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “…analyses retrieved from models on imagery frequently discussed in the literature, for example, imagery type, imagery perspective, temporal equivalence, the athletes age, or the athletes expertise (Cumming & Williams, 2013; Guillot & Collet, 2008; Holmes & Collins, 2001; Martin et al., 1999).”
Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines (2011, background): “Holmes and Collins introduced the PETTLEP framework, building on findings in functional neuroscientific research literature and experience in sport psychology [30].”
Effects of Dynamic and Static Imagery on Vividness of Imagery, Skiing Performance, and Confidence (2006, methodology): “In addition to this, Holmes and Collins (2001) have recently developed the PETTLEP model of imagery.”
Does Imagery Work? Effects on Performance and Mental Skills (2008, background): “Related to this notion that the imagery should “mirror” the actual performance environment as much as possible, Holmes and Collins (2001) developed a “functional equivalence” model that attempts to provide a theoretical explanation for having imagery be a similar to the actual situation as possible.”