Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use

By Aymeric Guillot, Christian Collet. 2008

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a19fb9e4b6772edc606506f4c6d46af54b3abb2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Citations in the corpus

Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines (2011, methodology): “The MI technique has been adopted in other research areas (education, medicine, music and sports), where the beneficial effect of MI added to PP has been confirmed, and 27 reviews summarise the research findings in those fields [1-27].”
The effects of imagery interventions in sports: a meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “…mental practice; mental strategies; mental stimulation; review Imagery is one of the most popular and well-accepted sport psychological strategies to improve performance, psychological skills, and injury rehabilitation (e.g. Cumming & Ramsey, 2009; Cumming & Williams, 2013; Guillot & Collet, 2008).”
The role of working memory in sport (2010, methodology): “…studies show that WM does not occupy a single anatomical location and therefore has to be considered a circuitry scattered over a large part of the cortex, recruiting a network of brain areas that are predominantly located in the prefrontal cortex and in parietal areas (Smith & Jonides, 1999).”
Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery (2008, background): “Previous work has demonstrated that mental practice with MI can improve the performance and learning of a variety of motor tasks (for reviews, see Feltz and Landers, 1983; Guillot and Collet, 2008).”
Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions (2012, background): “Notably, several imagery models were proposed to provide a detailed description of the key components of the imagery content to ascertain its efficacy (for reviews, see Guillot & Collet, 2008 ; Morris, Spittle, & Watt, 2005 ).”