Cooperation through emotional commitment.

By R. Frank. 2001

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4d2b93edb2b5233684f27b1c4b6da4446dbc0f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

TEACHING EMPATHY: A FRAMEWORK ROOTED IN SOCIAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE (2011, background): “When individuals gain understanding of the condi- tions and needs of others, they are more apt to become socially involved (Frank, 2001).”
Normative Bias and Adaptive Challenges: A Relational Approach to Coalitional Psychology and a Critique of Terror Management Theory (2005, background): “designed to prompt appropriate behavior in the face of adaptive challenges likely to have confronted our hunter-gatherer ancestors (Cosmides and Tooby, 2002; Curtis and Biran, 2001; Frank, 2001; Kirkpatrick, Waugh, Valencia, and Webster, 2002).”
Anxiety and Intergroup Bias: Terror Management or Coalitional Psychology? (2004, background): “Indeed, in contrast to TMT’s antiquated premise that anxiety constitutes an obstacle to effective behavior, a large and growing body of work indicates that affective systems are well designed to prompt appropriate behavior in the face of adaptive challenges likely to have confronted ancestral humans”
Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: the evolved psychology of relationship maintenance (2008, unknown): “Evolutionary theories suggest that love is designed to act as a commitment device, in part by helping individuals relinquish attractive alternatives that pose a threat to the long-term benefits of the relationship (Frank, 1988, 2001; Hirshleifer, 1987; Sabini & Silver, 2005).”
Social Empathy: A Model Built on Empathy, Contextual Understanding, and Social Responsibility That Promotes Social Justice (2011, background): “When individuals obtain an accurate empathic perspective about the conditions and needs of others, they are more apt to feel social responsibility and become socially involved (Frank, 2001; Hoffman, 2000).”
Nonhuman Species’ Reactions to Inequity and their Implications for Fairness (2006, background): “Second, and related to this, having strong reactions to inequity may be one of Frank’s proposed commitment devices (Frank, 1988, 2001).”