Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution

By Thomas R. Cusack, Torben Iversen, Philipp Rehm. 2006

434 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4bfa9db0445fb447c42f1c9939a32c4ec3ea665

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Equity, equality, or need? A study of popular preferences for welfare redistribution principles across 24 European countries (2013, background): “Regarding structural features, we argue that preferences towards welfare redistribution are a function of risk exposure (Cusack et al. 2006; Rehm 2009), implying that ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ express different PRJs (Aalberg 2003; Arts and Gelissen 2001).”
Asset Specificity, Institutional Complementarities and the Variety of Skill Regimes in Coordinated Market Economies (2009, background): “1 (see also Cusack et al., 2006)).”
Flexible employment, economic insecurity and social policy preferences in Europe (2010, background): “Furthermore, those with skills specific to particular firms or sectors – as opposed to more general skills – tend also to face higher unemployment risk and longer spells of unemployment, making them more insecure about their jobs and incomes (Cusack et al., 2006; Estevez-Abe et al., 2001; Iversen an”
Social Policy by Popular Demand (2011, background): “24 Iversen and Soskice 2001; Cusack, Iversen, and Rehm 2006; Rehm 2009; Rehm 2011.”
The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe (2018, background): “Indeed, exposure to risk –including risk deriving from global competition– shapes preferences in a more pro-redistribution direction (Balcells Ventura 2006; Cusack et al. 2006; Margalit 2013; Rehm 2009; Walter 2010).”
Age-Based Self-Interest, Intergenerational Solidarity and the Welfare State: A Comparative Analysis of Older People’s Attitudes Towards Public Childcare in 12 OECD Countries (2010, neutral): “In this framework, attitudes towards the welfare state are interpreted as a derivative of either one’s current material situation or of the anticipated risks that one may encounter over the life course, such as labour market risks (Cusack et al. 2006; Iversen & Soskice 2001; Kitschelt & Rehm 2006; R”
Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries (2011, background): “Therefore, given that religion has a strong effect when it comes to religious denomination, but that this effect vanishes when one considers church attendance, one might argue that the pathway is ideological, not via actual social support.(17)”
Paradoxes of Social Policy (2015, methodology): “Past research shows this question predicts party affiliation (Cusack et al. 2005), and the aggregate of this question is associated with inequality (Kelly and Enns 2010, Lupu and Pontusson 2011) and welfare generosity (Brooks and Manza 2007).”
Review Article: Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State – Recent Advances in the Literature (2010, background): “Studies such as Cusack et al. (2006), Rueda (2005), Rehm (2009), Häusermann (2010) or Häusermann and Walter (2010) all study the preferences of post-industrial risk groups for particular policies empirically, before linking them to what parties and governments actually do.”
The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe (2016, methodology): “Skill specificity is calculated following Cusack et al. (2006).44 Using this one-dimensional, continuous measure of skill specificity as opposed to the categorical one based on Fleckenstein et al.”
The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences (2014, background): “Most studies that focus on popular attitudes toward redistribution use cross-sectional data without explicitly looking at time trends (Cusack et al. 2006; Iversen and Soskice 2001; Rehm 2009; Rehm, Hacker, and Schlesinger 2012).”
Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession (2013, background): “through the possible loss of one’s job), they grow more supportive of higher levels of social assistance programs (Bean and Papadakis, 1998; Cusack et al. 2006; Iversen and Soskice 2001; Rehm 2009, 2011).”
Automation and the Welfare State: Technological Change as a Determinant of Redistribution Preferences (2019, background): “As in Cusack, Iversen, and Rehm (2006), this last dummy variable can be interpreted as a measure of realized risk (i.e., if an individual loses her or his job).”