Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism
By D. Slobin. 2000
335 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, History, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4af4a4c95e90e7cdd5ead5739687b03c7f48187
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In History
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event (2004, background): “However, as shown in the above analysis, the encoding of manner information relies largely on codability (Slobin 2000, 2004), and speakers of a language are more likely to pay linguistic attention to and elaborate manner if they use a language with high codability of this dimension.”
- The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events (2004, methodology): “As discussed in " Frog I " (Berman & Slobin, 1994) and elsewhere (Slobin, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2002), languages differ systematically in rhetorical style—that is, the ways in which events are analyzed and described in discourse.”
- Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events (2011, background): “Information about manner is regularly omitted or simplified in Spanish, though more frequently in directional than locational expressions (Slobin, 1996, 1997, 2000).”
- What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition (2006, positive): “It is striking that measures of language use across genres, as well as lexical diversity and specificity, present congruent assessments of a language's manner salience (Slobin, 2000).”
- Ways of Crossing a Spatial Boundary in Typologically Distinct Languages (2015, methodology): “The manners depicted in the stimulus pictures were chosen based on an earlier classification of manner verbs (Özçalışkan, 2004; Slobin, 2000) and included a broad representation of different subtypes of manner, such as rapid motion (e.”
- With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time (2006, background): “Bowerman & Choi, 2001, 2003; Slobin, 1996, 2000, 2003 ) that language-specific patterns of usage prompt corresponding patterns of categorization and conceptualization that shape the habitual cognitive patterns of speakers in the relevant communities; Slobin has called this thinking for speaking.”
- Codability Effects on the Expression of Manner of Motion in Turkish and English (2003, background): “That is, Turkish speakers—and speakers of other Vlanguages—are likely to conceptualize the domain of manner of movement in a more constrained fashion, due to the effects of linguistic structure on cognitive processes (Slobin, 2000).”
- Referential Density in Discourse and Syntactic Typology (2003, background): “What we have here, then, is relativity in discourse style, similar to what has been documented in a growing body of literature (e.g., Sherzer 1987, 1994; Friedrich 1986; Nichols 1988; Woodbury 1998; Gumperz 1996; Slobin 1996, 2000; Peeters 2000; Bickel 2001a; Noonan 2001, etc.).”
- The typology of motion expressions revisited1 (2009, background): “In fact, as noted by Wienold (1995) and Slobin (2000), V-framed languages tend to have small inventories of mannerof-motion verbs, so ideophones provide a way to convey notions that might be lexicalized by one word in an S-framed language like English, as the translations of the Korean examples…”
- LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT ONLINE: COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY (2003, positive): “…of manners of motion as activities that take place in specified geographical regions, while S-language speakers “seem to conceive of manner and directed motion as a single conceptual event , making it difficult to have a mental image of one without the other” (Ohara, 2000; Slobin, 2000, p. 132).”