Codability Effects on the Expression of Manner of Motion in Turkish and English

By D. Slobin. 2003

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c323d9350a6d9282aa0f5eb45deb58a6ce17404c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event (2004, background): “metaphorical motion events – in terms of both the frequency and diversity of manner verb use – also replicate the patterns observed for literal motion events in the two languages (Özçalışkan & Slobin 1999a, 2003).”
Ways of Crossing a Spatial Boundary in Typologically Distinct Languages (2015, background): “…research on motion events in general (e.g., Allen et al., 2007; Hickman, 2007; Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 2004; Oh, 2003; Özçalıskan, 2005, 2009; Özçalıskan & Slobin, 1999, 2003; Papafragou, Massey, & Gleitman, 2002; Slobin, 2004) and boundary-crossing events in particular (e.g., Naigles…”
L1 transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English (2012, background): “S-language speakers show a higher frequency and greater lexical diversity of manner verb use, as compared to V-language speakers (Özçalışkan & Slobin, 2003, p. 260).”
Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion (2010, unknown): “…Furman, Ishizuka, & Fujii, 2007; Berman & Slobin, 1994; Choi & Bowerman, 1991; Hickmann, 2003; Naigles, Eisenberg, Kako, Highter, & McGraw, 1998; Özçalişkan & Slobin, 1999, 2003; Papafragou, Massey, & Gleitman, 2002, 2005; Selimis, 2007; Selimis & Katis, 2003; Slobin, 1996a, 1996b, 1997,…”
With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time (2006, background): “Returning to Whorf with the added sophistication of recent cross-linguistic work on language use and acquisition, Slobin (1996, 2003; Ozcaliskan & Slobin, 2003 ) proposed that we recognize that there is a possible contrast between thinking for speaking and other thinking, with potential implication”