From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory

By L. Huddy. 2001

1,149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4a03942ca8a5ca88ec547a06c226e098ad0867c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Uses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology (2020, neutral): “…politically and psychologically potent identities like partisanship, race, religion, and place (e.g., Acharya, Blackwell, & Sen, 2018; Achen & Bartels, 2016; Cramer, 2016; Dawson, 1994; Green et al., 2004; Huddy, 2001, 2018; Huddy, Mason, & Aarøe, 2015; Jardina, 2019; Mason, 2018; Piston, 2018).”
Identity Politics and Politicized Identities: Identity Processes and the Dynamics of Protest (2014, background): “In her review of social identity theory, Huddy (2001) observes that social identity literature tends to neglect that real-world identities vary in strength.”
Identity concerns drive belief: The impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news (2018, background): “These social identity processes play a central role in political parties (Huddy, 2001), and political identities are represented in the brain similarly to other forms of group identities (Cikara et al.”
Explaining Group Influence: The Role of Identity and Emotion in Political Conformity and Polarization (2015, background): “Further, taking into account the fact that identity strength varies (Huddy 2001), group members who identify more strongly with the group than other members are more influenced by its norms on average (Terry and Hogg 1996; Terry, Hogg, and White 1999; also see Theiss-Morse 2009).”
From political opponents to enemies? The role of perceived moral distance in the animalistic dehumanization of the political outgroup (2016, background): “…liberal may be viewed as a sort of “membership emblem” through which we synthetically express our similarities to or differences from groups of individuals in terms of preferences and priorities about how things should work in the world (Green, 2004; Huddy, 2001; Jost, Ledgerwood, & Hardin, 2007).”
An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. (2004, background): “However, as many others have noted (e.g., Huddy, 2001; Phinney , 1992), self-categorization outside the laboratory is not always as simple and direct as suggested by studies using the minimal group paradigm.”
Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology (2015, neutral): “Self-reported ideology is well-known to be a highly imperfect predictor of individual issue preferences (Converse, 1964; Ellis & Stim-son, 2012; Jacoby, 1995; Goren, 2005; Greene, 2004; Green et al. 2004; Huddy, 2001; Stimson, 2004).”
Working While Liberal/Conservative: A Review of Political Ideology in Organizations (2020, background): “Scholars in the field of political science have focused on political ideology as identification with a social group (Greene, 1999; Huddy, 2001; Huddy, Mason, & Aarøe, 2015; Mason, 2018).”
Personal Political Salience: The Role of Personality in Collective Identity and Action (2007, background): “Research on individuals’ motivation to participate in collective action has enjoyed a recent surge in popularity in social and personality psychology (see, e.g., Brewer, 2001; Duncan, 1999, 2001; Duncan & Stewart, 1995; Huddy, 2001; Simon & Klandermans, 2001; Simon et al., 1998; Thoits &Virshup, 199”
Identity Politics and Trade Policy (2018, neutral): “The pertinent categories are history and context dependent and, to some extent, uid (Hogg et al., 1995; Huddy, 2001).”