RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF

By P. Poulikakos, Chao Zhang, G. Bollag, Kevan M. Shokat, N. Rosen. Nature, 2010

1,791 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Tumours with mutant BRAF are dependent on the RAF–MEK–ERK signalling pathway for their growth. We found that ATP-competitive RAF inhibitors inhibit ERK signalling in cells with mutant BRAF, but unexpectedly enhance signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Here we demonstrate the mechanistic basis for these findings. We used chemical genetic methods to show that drug-mediated transactivation of RAF dimers is responsible for paradoxical activation of the enzyme by inhibitors. Induction of ERK signalling requires direct binding of the drug to the ATP-binding site of one kinase of the dimer and is dependent on RAS activity. Drug binding to one member of RAF homodimers (CRAF–CRAF) or heterodimers (CRAF–BRAF) inhibits one protomer, but results in transactivation of the drug-free protomer. In BRAF(V600E) tumours, RAS is not activated, thus transactivation is minimal and ERK signalling is inhibited in cells exposed to RAF inhibitors. These results indicate that RAF inhibitors will be effective in tumours in which BRAF is mutated. Furthermore, because RAF inhibitors do not inhibit ERK signalling in other cells, the model predicts that they would have a higher therapeutic index and greater antitumour activity than mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors, but could also cause toxicity due to MEK/ERK activation. These predictions have been borne out in a recent clinical trial of the RAF inhibitor PLX4032 (refs 4, 5). The model indicates that promotion of RAF dimerization by elevation of wild-type RAF expression or RAS activity could lead to drug resistance in mutant BRAF tumours. In agreement with this prediction, RAF inhibitors do not inhibit ERK signalling in cells that coexpress BRAF(V600E) and mutant RAS.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c48468c28eebc952daa674dfb72d6158a0cd3caa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Trey Ideker
  2. Christopher Sander
  3. Matthew Meyerson
  4. Jan F. Prins
  5. Nikolaus Schultz
  6. Walter Kolch
  7. Fabio Vandin
  8. Benjamin J. Raphael

In Molecular Biology

  1. S. Baylin
  2. Peter W. Laird
  3. Trey Ideker
  4. Eric S. Lander
  5. Manel Esteller
  6. Katherine A. Hoadley
  7. J. Herman
  8. Gad Getz

In Oncology

  1. William Pao
  2. J. Engelman
  3. Gregory Riely
  4. Vincent A. Miller
  5. Antoni Ribas
  6. C. Der
  7. M. Kris
  8. K. Flaherty

Citations in the corpus