Are risk preferences consistent?: The influence of decision domain and personality
By Emma Soane, N. Chmiel. 2005
176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3e8d86497298c1a3a675f308c4945feb16910aa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Baruch Fischhoff
- W. Bruine de Bruin
- Andrew M. Parker
- L. Hendrickx
- Heather Butler
- K. Stanovich
- F. Del Missier
- Timo Mäntylä
In General Decision Sciences
- W. Bruine de Bruin
- Baruch Fischhoff
- Andrew M. Parker
- L. Hendrickx
- Alexander Gattig
- Heather Butler
- K. Stanovich
- R. Gifford
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. (2007, background): “Correlations have been found between the ability to resist framing errors and such personality traits as low neuroticism, high agreeableness, and conscientiousness (Soane & Chmiel, 2005) as well as low impulsiveness and anxiety (Lauriola, Russo, Lucidi, Violani, & Levin, 2005).”
- Judgmental Discounting and Environmental Risk Perception: Dimensional Similarities, Domain Differences, and Implications for Sustainability (2007, background): “Soane and Chmiel (2005) compared risk preferences in three decision domains: work, health, and personal finance.”
- Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure (2011, unknown): “However, recent advances suggest that risk taking is content, or domain, specific (Blais &Weber, 2006; Hanoch, Johnson, &Wilke, 2006; Soane & Chmiel, 2005; Weber, Blais, & Betz, 2002).”