Mortality salience and religion: divergent effects on the defense of cultural worldviews for the religious and the non-religious

By Ara Norenzayan, Ilan Dar-Nimrod, Ian Hansen, T. Proulx. 2009

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3468ec1d14711b92d8c27fb14a1ce207bd4c7d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. N. Mandel
2. M. Bluemke

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Daniele Mathras
2. N. Mandel
3. M. Bluemke
4. Adam B. Cohen
5. David Mick

In Social Psychology

1. J. Jong
2. Jamin Halberstadt
3. Daniele Mathras
4. N. Mandel
5. M. Bluemke
6. Adam B. Cohen
7. David Mick
8. Carlos J. Torelli

Citations in the corpus

• Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief (2012, methodology): “Participants in the control condition were instructed to write down specifically “what happens to you when you watch TV” and “about the feelings that thoughts of watching TV arouse in you” (see, e.g., Norenzayan et al., 2009 for a similar procedure).”
• The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda (2016, background): “Becker, 1973; Cohen & Hall, 2009; Jonas & Fischer, 2006; Norenzayan et al. 2009 2 Religious beliefs about external control (e.g., belief in a controlling God) will mitigate the effects of a perceived lack of power, freedom, or personal control on preference for high-effort products, luxury…”