Remanufacturing and the Component Commonality Decision

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of Take‐Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry (2017, background): “However, every item collected may not be suitable for remanufacturing due to wear and tear (Ferrer and Swaminathan 2010, Karaer and Lee 2007, Subramanian et al. 2013), thus only a fraction h 2 [0, 1] of the collected volume is viable for reman-ufacturing regardless of collector.”
Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Critical Review, and Future Research (2013, background): “In Subramanian, Ferguson, and Toktay (2012), an OEM has an existing product line with two products: a high-end product with quality sh, and a low-end product with quality sl .”
The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products (2017, background): “…Swaminathan 2006), marketing strategies (e.g., Atasu et al. 2008, Oraiopoulos et al. 2012), impact of remanufacturing on new product design (Atasu and Souza 2013, Galbreth et al. 2013, Orsdemir et al. 2014, Subramanian et al. 2013), and production capacity (Vorasayan and Ryan 2006), among others.”
Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future (2015, background): “In this manner, case studies such as those by Wei, Zhao, and Sun (2013), Toyasaki et al. (2013), and Subramanian, Ferguson, and Toktay (2013) can help researchers to apply and to modify their theoretical methodologies in practical situations.”