Running for the 7:45: The effects of public transit improvements on commuter stress

By Richard E. Wener, G. W. Evans, Donald Phillips, Natasha Nadler. 2003

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2fb322fc739f6be2ecbd317c6d501489a1b72b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Liang Ma
2. Birgitta Gatersleben
3. David Uzzell
4. R. Ye
5. David Lois
6. Mercedes López-Sáez

In Transportation

1. R. Ye
2. Liang Ma
3. Birgitta Gatersleben
4. David Uzzell
5. J. De Vos
6. P. Singleton
7. Oliver Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi (2014, methodology): “The AHP also prioritizes alternatives based on a common set of criteria into quantitative and qualitative terms (Yedla & Shrestha, 2003).”
• Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute (2007, background): “…main sources of this stress are delays caused by traffic volume, the behavior of other road users (for car users), and poor infrastructure provision (for users of public transport; e.g., Evans et al., 2002; Novaco et al., 1990; Rasmussen et al., 2000; Schaeffer et al., 1988; Wener et al., 2004).”
• Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity? (2019, background): “A number of studies (Evans et al., 2002; Novaco et al., 1990; Wener et al., 2003) have established the link between commuting and mental stress, while commuting stress can further spill over into domains such as work performance and family relationships (Novaco et al.”
• A Look at the Ecotherapy Research Evidence (2009, unknown): “Outside the offi ce, longer commute times diminish motivation, concentration, and proofreading skills (Schaeffer, Street, Singer, & Baum, 1988; Wener, Evans, Phillips, & Nadler, 2003).”
• The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach (2004, unknown): “The reason for analyzing both commute distance and time is that, although they may be strongly correlated, the former is directly associated with the environmental consequences of transportation, whereas the latter is related to the quality of life and the level of time pressure workers experience (”