Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute

By Birgitta Gatersleben, David Uzzell. 2007

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b99d2de10fec527152e64e0d6afeee40ca12cbcb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. J. De Vos
2. Bert van Wee
3. K. Maat
4. Dick Ettema
5. A. Davis
6. Liang Ma
7. Adam Martin
8. Ben Clark

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Mattias Kärrholm
2. C. Sternudd
3. Dick Ettema
4. J. De Vos
5. Liang Ma
6. Bert van Wee
7. S. Handy
8. Oliver Smith

In Transportation

1. J. De Vos
2. Bert van Wee
3. Liang Ma
4. R. Ye
5. K. Maat
6. Oliver Smith
7. P. Singleton
8. C. Sternudd

Citations in the corpus

• Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction (2018, background): “Intermediate satisfaction levels are mostly found for car users (De Vos et al., 2016; Gatersleben and Uzzel, 2007; Handy and Thigpen, 2018; Lancée et al., 2017; Legrain et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016; Mokhtarian et al., 2015; Morris and Guerra, 2015; Olsson et al., 2013; Páez and Whalen, 2010; Singl”
• Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity? (2019, background): “A growing number of studies have found active commuting by walking and bicycling is perceived as more “relaxing and exciting” than commuting by car and public transport, which are perceived as being more “stressful and boring” (Gatersleben and Uzzell, 2007).”
• Perceived urban design qualities and affective experiences of walking (2016, background): “Scenery was the most frequently mentioned pleasant aspect of the daily commute in the study by Gatersleben and uzzell (2007), whereas the main source of displeasure for pedestrians was overgrown and unlit paths, lack of safe crossings and the sheer volume of traffic causing noise, pollution and…”
• Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice (2014, background): “Decisions that might appear at the outset to be irrational can often be explained when the influence of values is appropriately accounted for (Steg 2005; Gatersleben and Uzzell 2007; Páez and Whalen 2010).”
• Commute well-being differences by mode: Evidence from Portland, Oregon, USA (2017, result): “…for evaluating the impact of modes on CWB. Based on results from previous survey research from Sweden, England, and Canada (Friman et al., 2013, Gatersleben and Uzzell, 2007, Páez and Whalen, 2010), it is hypothesized that active travelers (walk and bike commuters) have higher commute…”
• Why are cyclists the happiest commuters? Health, pleasure and the e-bike (2019, background): “Cyclists are time and again found to be the most satisfied commuters (Avila-Palencia et al., 2017; Gatersleben and Uzzell, 2007; Martin et al., 2014; Paige Willis et al., 2013; Singleton, 2018; Smith, 2017; St-Louis et al., 2014).”
• Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature (2010, background): “…of time, being tired, too much effort, the bicycle being an uncharacteristic transportation mode and difficulties with trip-chaining (Noland and Kunreuther, 1995; Dickinson et al., 2003; Stinson and Bhat, 2004; Gatersleben and Appleton, 2007; Gatersleben and Uzzell, 2007; Wardman et al., 2007).”