Political Leadership: New Perspectives and Approaches
By Pär Daléus. 2015
350 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c29d7254450782095f0d1929a20c1de292bcf70b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Nathan P. Kalmoe
- M. Mildenberger
- L. Valentino
- Leah Stokes
- Hugo Mercier
- Anthony Leiserowitz
- Christopher Warshaw
- M. F. Hunzaker
In Safety Research
- Hugo Mercier
- Yanna Krupnikov
- Nathan P. Kalmoe
- M. Mildenberger
- L. Valentino
- Leah Stokes
- James N. Druckman
- Anthony Leiserowitz
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Mildenberger
- Yanna Krupnikov
- Hugo Mercier
- Samara Klar
- John Ryan
- James N. Druckman
- Nathan P. Kalmoe
- Leah Stokes
Citations in the corpus
- How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020, background): “Issue positions are endogenous to partisan animus: elite polarization drives both affective polarization (Rogowski and Sutherland 2016; Webster and Abramowitz 2017), as well as issue positions (via cue-taking, see Lenz 2012).”
- Uses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology (2020, background): “The platform produces representative results on some tests and not others (Berinsky, Huber, & Lenz, 2012; Krupnikov & Levine, 2014).”
- Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States (2017, background): “Finally, in other policy domains, partisan cues are found to be important to explaining patterns of support.[22, 23] It is therefore reasonable to expect that partisans should respond to partisan primes (like elite support) on energy policy as they would for other domains, moving towards their copar”
- How Gullible are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Science (2017, background): “In particular, people often adopt the opinions of their favored candidate or party (“party cues,” see, Lenz, 2013).”
- Mapping Cultural Schemas: From Theory to Method (2019, background): “This finding runs counter to the predictions of more purely partisan identity-based cue theories (e.g., Achen and Bartels 2016; Campbell et al. 1960; Converse 1964; Kinder and Kalmoe 2017; Lenz 2013; Zaller 2012).”
- Public opinion on climate change: Is there an economy–environment tradeoff? (2017, background): “A growing literature has emphasized that mass publics are opinion followers rather than leaders (e.g. Lenz 2013) and the importance of political identity to climate beliefs (e.g. Hamilton and Saito 2015), but a two-time period panel cannot strongly confirm this causal relationship.”