INTRAGUILD PREY SUFFER FROM ENRICHMENT OF THEIR RESOURCES: A MICROCOSM EXPERIMENT WITH CILIATES

By S. Diehl, Margit Feissel. 2001

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c260befc85d1d7b25f5823e6f9c7b10d3fd8fb03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Takimoto
2. Pablo A. Marquet
3. D. Post
4. T. Ingram
5. Cheryl J. Briggs
6. A. Roos
7. B. Anholt
8. P. Kratina

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. G. Takimoto
2. A. Janssen
3. Cheryl J. Briggs
4. Pablo A. Marquet
5. T. Ingram
6. Elizabeth T. Borer
7. A. Roos
8. M. Sabelis

In Plant Science

1. A. Janssen
2. Pablo A. Marquet
3. Cheryl J. Briggs
4. Elizabeth T. Borer
5. G. Takimoto
6. M. Arim
7. D. Post

Citations in the corpus

• Food‐web connectance and predator interference dampen the paradox of enrichment (2008, unknown): “…studies suggest that the relationship between enrichment and population persistence depends on the food-web structure that modifies the exploitative top-down pressure of the consumer (Leibold and Wilbur 1992, Persson et al. 2001), and omnivory (Diehl and Feissel 2001, Trzcinski et al. 2005).”
• INTRAGUILD PREDATION USUALLY DOES NOT DISRUPT BIOLOGICAL CONTROL (2006, background): “Although several studies tested various predictions of the theory of intraguild predation (Holyoak and Sachdev, 1998; Morin, 1999; Diehl and Feissel, 2000, 2001; Borer et al., 2003; Price and Morin, 2004), only few studies tested whether intraguild predators can exclude intraguild prey at high pro”
• Testing intraguild predation theory in a field system: does numerical dominance shift along a gradient of productivity? (2003, background): “The most consistent prediction from all formulations of IGP theory is a unimodal species diversity–productivity relationship (Diehl & Feissel 2001).”
• Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology (2004, background): “A consistent theoretical prediction is that persistence of IGP depends on the existence of differences in the efficiency of resource exploitation between the IGPredator and the IGPrey, being lower in the former than in the latter (Holt & Polis 1997; Diehl & Feissel 2000, 2001; Mylius et al. 2001).”
• Stability and persistence of food webs with omnivory: Is there a general pattern? (2012, result): “In contrast to outcomes of simple three-species models (Holt and Polis 1997, Diehl and Feissel 2000, Mylius et al. 2001) and previous experimental work (Morin 1999, Diehl and Feissel 2000, 2001) coexistence of the IG predator with the IG prey was not achieved.”
• Proximate structural mechanisms for variation in food-chain length (2007, methodology): “Simple food-chain models predict that food-chain length will increase with increasing resource availability while IGP models predict the highest food-chain length at intermediate levels of resources (Fig. 2; Diehl and Feissel 2001).”