The family's effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches

By R. Basco. 2013

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c210c700b2ca57f35143de85a69a71a2ca99d789

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Petra Andries
2. Wouter Broekaert
3. Ines Herrero
4. Koenraad Debackere

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Ines Herrero
2. Koenraad Debackere
3. Petra Andries

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ines Herrero
2. Petra Andries

Citations in the corpus

• Innovation processes in family firms: the relevance of organizational flexibility (2016, background): “Ownership and other demographic indicators of being a family firm should ideally be combined with essence indicators that more directly measure actual differences in behavior (Chua et al. 1999; Chrisman et al. 2005; Basco, 2013) to reveal greater variety within family firms.”
• How Familial Is Family Social Capital? Analyzing Bonding Social Capital in Family and Nonfamily Firms (2018, methodology): “We used two different performance measures that have been widely used in the literature (Basco, 2013): the return on assets (ROA; defined as earnings before interest and taxes over total assets) and the return on equity (ROE; defined as earnings before taxes over shareholders’ equity).”