The continuity of microevolution and macroevolution

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A More Fine-Grained Measure of Students' Acceptance of Evolution: Development of the Inventory of Student Evolution Acceptance—I-SEA (2012, background): “Yet, there is a general agreement from the biological sciences community that the results of evolution in the short term (microevolution) and long term (macroevolution) are perceivably different (Freeman & Herron, 2007; Futuyma, 2005; Gould, 2002; Simons, 2002).”
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Measure of Understanding of Macroevolution: Introducing the MUM (2009, background): “This division can be quite blurred and dynamic, adjusting to new evidence, different organisms, and unique situations or conditions (Hendry & Kinnison, 2001; Simons, 2002).”
Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. (2006, background): “Mesoudi et al. consider that evolution occurs at the trait level because they accept uncritically the idea that macroevolution is Darwinian microevolution writ large (but see Erwin 2000; Carroll 2001; Simons 2002; among others, for some of the issues involved).”
A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness (2013, methodology): “Notably, the use of a geometric mean in fitness models in biology is by no means a new concept (see Lewontin and Cohen, 1969; Boyce and Perrins, 1987; Sober, 2001; Simons, 2002; Lee and Doughty, 2003).”