UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATIONS IN JAPAN: THE ROLE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS IN TRANSFORMING THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM
By Kazuyuki Motohashi. 2005
341 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c166a5b278321e244d2d54bf74e890ba1c0b6541
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Boris Lokshin
- René Belderbos
- Geert Duysters
- Martin A. Carree
- J. Nishimura
- Hiroyuki Okamuro
- Robert Huggins
- Andrew Johnston
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Andrew Johnston
- Robert Huggins
- Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
- Rebecca Steffenson
- Boris Lokshin
- Norat Roig-Tierno
- Francisco Mas-Verdu
- Geert Duysters
In Strategy and Management
- Boris Lokshin
- Geert Duysters
- René Belderbos
- Martin A. Carree
- Robert Huggins
- J. Nishimura
- Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
- Andrew Johnston
Citations in the corpus
- Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics (2015, background): “Technology-based firms are businesses with high growth and survival potential according to their innovative nature (Motohashi, 2005).”
- Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration (2012, background): “…on Western (especially European) countries, while relatively few studies exist concerning UIC in Japan and Eastern Asia (Eom and Lee 2010; Hemmert et al. 2008; Motohashi 2005; Motohashi and Yun 2007; Okamuro et al. 2011), despite the recent growth of interest in and rapid development of UIC.”
- Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance (2014, background): “Engaging in university collaboration can be attractive for firms since it allows inexpensive and low-risk access to specialist knowledge and generic, basic R&D (Arranz and Arroyabe 2008; Azagra-Caro, et al., 2014; Beers et al. 2008; Mototashi 2005; Woerter, 2012).”
- Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy (2008, background): “Firms with a broader outlook and a greater willingness to collaborate are more likely to engage in university/industry collaboration (Motohashi, 2005).”
- R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: an empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan (2011, methodology): “However, patents are generally regarded as an appropriate index of invention counts in the empirical literature (Acs et al. 2002; George et al. 2002; Kim et al. 2005; Motohashi 2005; Jaffe and Trajtenberg 2002).”
- Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, background): “Universities and research centers can be attractive for industry partners providing low-cost access to generic R&D (Arranz & Arroyabe, 2008; Beers, Berghall, & Poot, 2008; Mototashi, 2005). Taken together, the alliance types described above make up a focal firm's alliance portfolio. This is in line ”