Minority and Majority Discrimination: When and Why ☆

By Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, M. Brewer. 2001

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0a883254f619befd5445fc16f67581e26a2b8d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Cynthia Pickett
2. M. Brewer
3. Q. Liao
4. Wai-Tat Fu
5. William D. Crano
6. Hazel R. Atuel
7. Viviane Seyranian
8. M. Hogg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Cynthia Pickett
2. M. Brewer
3. Q. Liao
4. M. Strohmaier
5. Wai-Tat Fu
6. William D. Crano
7. Viviane Seyranian
8. M. Hogg

Citations in the corpus

• #Snowden: Understanding Biases Introduced by Behavioral Differences of Opinion Groups on Social Media (2016, background): “There are two typical arguments explaining the phenomena [29].”
• Dimensions of Majority and Minority Groups (2008, background): “…studies of majority and minority groups In the social psychological literature, majority and minority groups usually are defi ned in terms of size (Leonardelli & Brewer, 2001), power and/or status (Blanz, Mummendey, Mielke, & Klink, 1998; Sachdev & Bourhis, 1991; Tajfel, 1981), or…”
• The Impact of Assimilation and Differentiation Needs on Perceived Group Importance and Judgments of Ingroup Size (2002, background): “Similarly, other research using the optimal distinctiveness framework has demonstrated that certain responses (e.g., bias, identification, discrimination) are more likely when a group is distinctive or is a minority group (see Abrams, 1994; Hornsey & Hogg, 1999; Leonardelli & Brewer, 2001).”