Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. An editorial essay
By Márcio Santilli, P. Moutinho, S. Schwartzman, Daniel C. Nepstad, L. Curran, C. Nobre. 2005
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0954c70d99105dd35a8bb6aa040ca80c5d01230
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Corbera
- Claudia M. Stickler
- Daniel C. Nepstad
- Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho
- M. Estrada
- M. Skutsch
- Michael T. Coe
- L. Peskett
Citations in the corpus
- Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach (2009, background): “…voluntary commitment to reduce their deforestation rates in the form of a reduction target vis-à-vis this national baseline (Moutinho et al., 2005; Santilli et al., 2005; Environmental Defense and the Amazon Institute for Environmental Research (IPAM), 2007; Ogonowski et al., 2007; Greenpeace,…”
- The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region (2009, background): “Our review is written with the assumption that REDD will eventually compensate nation-wide reductions in carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, as originally conceived (Santilli et al., 2005), because of the risk of ‘leakage’ from subnational programs.”
- Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point (2008, background): “The proposal to compensate those tropical nations that succeed in reducing their nationwide emissions of greenhouse gases from deforestation (Santilli et al. 2005) has gained momentum in the UNFCCC process (Gullison et al.”
- “Carbon rights”, REDD+ and payments for environmental services (2014, background): “, 2003) and presented as a discussion paper in 2003 at CoP 9 – and published in 2005 under another title (Santilli et al., 2005) – can be considered as the starting point for the REDD proposal.”
- Making REDD work for the poor : a poverty environment partnership (PEP) report (2008, background): “It is estimated that deforestation and other forms of land degradation – mainly in the tropics – may account for up to one fifth of all anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (Santilli et al., 2005; Stern, 2006; UNFCCC, 2006; IPCC, 2007).”
- Clearing the way for reducing emissions from tropical deforestation (2007, methodology): “Santilli et al (2005) propose to determine the BAU scenario based on historic rates, such as the period since 1980 or 1990.”
- A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated Successful Efforts for “avoided deforestation” (REDD) (2009, background): “The mechanism is therefore assumed to compensate overall reductions of deforestation, as this is explicitly stated by the prominent “Compensated Reductions” approach (Santilli et al., 2005).”
- Rights to Land, Forests and Carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica (2011, result): “To counter the government‘s opposition to crediting the standing forest, Brazilian environmentalists proposed the creation of a mechanism termed ―compensated reductions‖, which would involve establishing reduction targets and compensation for avoided deforestation contingent upon verified reductions”
- Linking requirements with capabilities for deforestation monitoring in the context of the UNFCCC-REDD process (2007, background): “A basic underpinning requirement to support efforts for reducing deforestation is the systematic long-term observation of forests and other land cover characteristics and changes (Santilli et al 2005).”