The 'Conventionalisation' thesis reconsidered: structural and ideological transformation of Australian organic agriculture
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c07abebf0655341e1023839287207c0401a54843
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Plant Science
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay (2010, unknown): “…farm-worker welfare, animal welfare, land stewardship, resource conservation, preservation of heritage breeds and sustainability are no longer strongly associated with organic foods 14 both in the US 19 and abroad (e.g., Ireland 16 , Great Britain 36,37 , Australia and New Zealand 38,39 ).”
- Conversion to organic farming: a multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences. A review (2011, background): “Such studies compare organic and conventional farmers’ attitudes, "potential converters" and organic farmers, or recent and more experienced converters (Best, 2005; Koesling et al., 2005; Lockie and Halpin, 2005).”
- Farmers' markets and the “good food” value chain: a preliminary study (2008, background): “As Lockie and Halpin (2005) suggest, words do not just describe, they also shape relations of production and consumption.”
- Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: assembling the “citizen consumer” (2009, background): “agroecosystem and community sustainability (for a critical review see Lockie and Halpin 2005 ).”
- Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review (2011, unknown): “The lack of an adequate, nuanced analysis has also been raised by Lockie and Halpin (2005, p. 287) , who point out that the binary opposition between ‘artisanal’ and ‘industrial’, between ‘lifestyle’ and ‘agribusiness’ producers, can be problematic, as it “conflates differences in economic scale wi”