Absorptive capacity and new product development

By G. Stock, N. Greis, W. Fischer. 2001

453 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf19f71b888ae1b244b6e5dd84c0e36863f5bba0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. María Jesús Nieto
2. Oliver Gassmann
3. Marcus M. Keupp

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Oliver Gassmann
2. Marcus M. Keupp
3. Ronaldo Parente
4. Masaaki Kotabe
5. M. Hiebl

In Strategy and Management

1. Oliver Gassmann
2. Marcus M. Keupp
3. Stein Østbye
4. María Jesús Nieto
5. P. Quevedo
6. Kristin Woll
7. Mikko Moilanen
8. Masaaki Kotabe

Citations in the corpus

• Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation (2014, background): “Typically, researchers have used proxies such as R&D expenditures (Cantner and Pyka 1998; Rocha 1999; Stock et al. 2001), level of R&D investment (Grünfeld 2003; Leahy and Neary 2007), continuous R&D activities (Cassiman and Veugelers 2006; Chun and Mun 2012) and existence of a R&D”
• Analyzing the determinants of firm§s absorptive capacity: beyond R&D (2008, unknown): “capacity theory, a considerable number of other studies, particularly in the field of industrial economy, use absorptive capacity to analyze business efforts in the area of R&D (Veugelers, 1997; Stock et al., 2001).”
• Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort (2005, background): “innovative activities (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990; Cockburn and Henderson, 1998) and improves the efficiency of the process of development of new products (Atuahene-Gima, 1992; Stock et al., 2001).”
• Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation (2007, background): “Researchers argue that such narrowness or reduced ‘absorptive capacity’ negatively hurts performance in the long run (Miller and Chen, 1996; Stock et al., 2001).”
• Innovation Management Measurement: A Review (2006, unknown): “Stock et al. (2001) note an inverted-U relationship between R&D intensity and NPD performance, and Bougrain and Haudeville (2002) point out that it does not influence the future prospects of a project and is, indeed, an imperfect measure of innovation activity.”
• Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector (2013, background): “Many authors who studied technological innovation have supported this view and found R&D intensity to be a valid measure for absorptive capacity (Gambardella, 1992; Mowery et al., 1996; Cantner and Pyka, 1998; Rocha, 1999; Tsai, 2001; Meeus et al., 2001; Stock et al., 2001; Griffith et al., 2003).”