Coopetition and product innovation performance : The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms
By Isabel Estrada, Dries Faems, Pedro de Faria. 2016
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/beb47694de556d42798d14b43e3b46bcf10b9e80
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Strategy and Management
- David Massé
- Elvin Matos Collado
- Rainer Harms
- Johanna Gast
- Katherine Gundolf
- Jaffar Abbas
- Iftikhar Hussain
- Nicola Mirc
Citations in the corpus
- “All for One and One for All?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case (2019, background): “These studies explain that although both partners must share information and knowledge to achieve the common goal of the collaboration (Dyer and Singh, 1998; Gnyawali and Park, 2011), they remain competitors and thus must protect the strategic core of their knowledge from each other (Baruch and Lin,”
- The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Innovation upon Sustainable Performance in Islamic Banks: A Mediation Analysis through an SEM Approach (2019, background): “The sharing of knowledge promotes the transmission of learning between teams, groups and individuals working within the organizations [19,20].”
- Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge? (2019, background): “Because coopetitors' resources, knowledge and strategic goals are similar (Estrada et al., 2016), opportunistic knowledge acquisition is a particular risk in coo-petition (Chevallier et al., 2016).”