Describing conversational dominance

By H. Itakura. 2001

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be6090f1b5589f4b128fa15d7faf555675268902

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. E. Galaczi
2. Daniel M. K. Lam
3. Lyn May
4. Larry Davis

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. E. Galaczi
2. Daniel M. K. Lam
3. Lyn May
4. Larry Davis

Citations in the corpus

• ConsensUs (2018, background): “However, verbal discussions can be dominated by one individual, either by means of conversation dominance (Itakura 2001) or social status (Dubrovsky et al. 1991), which may leave groups vulnerable to groupthink (Janis 1972), production blocking (Lamm and Trommsdorff 1973), or social loafing (Latane…”
• Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of the First Certificate in English Examination (2008, background): “Based on Itakura (2001) , conversational dominance was operationalised as the quantity of talk (“quantitative dominance”), interruptions (“participatory dominance”), and questions (“sequential dominance”).”