Deciphering Community and Race Effects on Adolescent Premarital Childbearing

By Scott J. South, Eric P. Baumer. 2000

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be1a65129ae50302e6dbb796debb18e060b932e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In General Health Professions

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Effect of Neighborhood Context on the College Aspirations of African American Adolescents (2007, background): “Brooks-Gunn et al., 1993, 1997; Bursik & Grasmick, 1993; Catsambis & Beveridge, 2001; Crane, 1991; Duncan, Brooks-Gunn, & Klebanov, 1994; Simons, Simons, Burt, Brody, & Cutrona, 2005; South & Baumer, 2000; South, Baumer, & Lutz, 2003; Sucoff & Upchurch, 1998).”
Now or later? The theory of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions (2011, background): “…be influential come from studies that show that social networks have a strong influence on childbearing intentions (e.g., Bühler & Fratczak, 2007; South & Baumer, 2000) and that girls’ childbearing intentions are influenced by their perceptions of their friends’ experiences as mothers (Bernardi,…”
Complexity and Empirical Economics (2005, background): “Evidence of neighborhood-based social interactions has been found in the context of teenage fertility (Crane, 1991; South and Baumer, 2000), use of government-based programs to help the poor (Aizer and Currie, 2004; Bertrand et al.”
Individual and School Structural Effects on African American High School Students' Academic Achievement (2007, background): “In particular, because adolescents are sporadically interacting with employed and financially secure neighbors, they are routinely shown that there are few benefits to achieving success in school (South and Baumer, 2000).”
What’s the ’Hood Got to Do with It? Parental Perceptions about How Neighborhood Mechanisms Affect Their Children (2006, unknown): “This mechanism also commands a great deal of social scientific support, as our review indicated (Anderson, 1990, 1991; Case & Katz, 1991; Ginther et al., 2000; South & Baumer, 2000; Sullivan, 1989).”
Schools or Neighborhoods or Both?: Race and Ethnic Segregation and Educational Attainment (2009, methodology): “…and 1992 waves, and data from teach- Data from the 1990 U.S. Census about students’ residential zip code to tracts as the most often-used ecological unit to study neighborhood characteristics (e.g., Ainsworth 2002; South and Baumer 2000; South such things as backyards, alleys, rivers and so on.”
Quantifying the Effect of Neighbourhood on Individuals: Challenges, Alternative Approaches, and Promising Directions (2008, background): “Studies that have examined the social relationships in disadvantaged U.S. neighbourhoods typically have emphasized the importance of peer and role model influences; see Sullivan, 1989, Anderson, 1990, 1991; Diehr et al., 1993; South and Baumer, 2000; and Ginther, Haveman and Wolfe, 2000).”
Regional value differences in Europe and the social consequences of divorce: A test of the stigmatization hypothesis (2007, background): “Although the community eVects in these studies are often interpreted in terms of social norms, the structural measures that are used are far removed from such interpretations (South and Baumer, 2000).”
Interpreting Community Effects on Youth Educational Attainment (2003, result): “Billy, J. O. G., Brewster, K. L., & Grady, W. R. (1994).”