Regional value differences in Europe and the social consequences of divorce: A test of the stigmatization hypothesis

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Descriptive norms, prescriptive norms, and social control: An intercultural comparison of people's reactions to uncivil behaviors (2009, background): “…undesirable behaviors (norm transgressions, uncivil behaviors) there is a negative correlation between the extent to which a behavior is frequent and the extent to which it is seen as violating societal standards (see Kalmijn & Uunk, 2007, and Lindbeck, Nyborg, & Weibull, 1999, for a similar idea).”
Employment status and subjective well-being: the role of the social norm to work (2016, unknown): “The first is known as the ‘stigmatization hypothesis’ (Kalmijn and Uunk, 2007).”
Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations (2010, background): “With the exception of the Kalmijn and Uunk (2007) study (which has no counterpart in the U.”
Country Differences in the Effects of Divorce on Well-Being: The Role of Norms, Support, and Selectivity (2010, background): “Earlier studies found more negative social consequences of divorce in more conservative regions in Europe (Kalmijn and Uunk, 2007).”