The Influence of Macromolecular Crowding and Macromolecular Confinement on Biochemical Reactions in Physiological Media*

By A. Minton. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001

1,303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Detailed knowledge of the rates, equilibria, and mechanism of biochemical reactions has traditionally been acquired through experiments conducted on solutions containing low concentrations (less than about 1 mg/ml) of total protein, nucleic acid, and/or polysaccharide together with buffer salts, low molecular weight substrates, and cofactors as required. In con-trast, biochemical reactions in living systems take place in media containing substantially greater total concentrations (50–400 mg/ml) of macromolecules that may be present in solution and/or in indefinitely large arrays (e.g. cytoskeletal fibers) (1, 2). Because no single macromolecular species may be present at high concentration, but all species taken together occupy a significant fraction of the volume of the medium, such media are referred to as “crowded” (3) and/or “confining” (4) rather than “concentrated,” depending upon whether the macrosolutes are soluble and/or structured. Fig. 1 provides a sche-matic illustration of crowding and confinement in eukaryotic cytoplasm. In such media, nonspecific interactions between macrosolutes contribute significantly to the total free energy of the medium. High concentrations of “background” macromolecules that do not participate directly in a particular test reaction have been observed to induce order-of-magnitude or greater changes in the rates and equilibria of numerous test reactions (see below). To properly assess the physiological role of a particular reaction or set of reactions characterized in vitro, it is important to consider the possible influence of crowding and/or confinement upon the reaction in its physiological milieu.

Subfields: Biophysics, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdf3dff7b4eace45e8f189df964bdbb992488dd1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biophysics

  1. R. Winter
  2. D. Lopes
  3. Stefan Grudzielanek
  4. Christopher R. Myers
  5. Yanshun Liu
  6. James P. Sethna
  7. David S. Eisenberg
  8. Ryan N. Gutenkunst

In Cell Biology

  1. R. Winter
  2. D. Lopes
  3. Stefan Grudzielanek
  4. Christopher R. Myers
  5. Yanshun Liu
  6. James P. Sethna
  7. David S. Eisenberg
  8. Ryan N. Gutenkunst

In Molecular Biology

  1. R. Winter
  2. D. Lopes
  3. Stefan Grudzielanek
  4. K. Vogtt
  5. Leonid A. Mirny
  6. Christopher R. Myers
  7. Jessica W. Wu
  8. Yanshun Liu

Citations in the corpus