Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence

By G. Rowe, George Wright, A. McColl. 2004

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd5bb793271123739f792ab406c7dc7eca93a6fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Tobias Gnatzy
2. Inga-Lena Darkow
3. Johannes Warth
4. Heiko A. Gracht

In Social Psychology

1. Inga-Lena Darkow
2. Heiko A. Gracht
3. Jan Mattsson
4. Stuart J. Barnes

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Heiko A. Gracht
2. Inga-Lena Darkow
3. Tobias Gnatzy
4. Johannes Warth
5. Stuart J. Barnes
6. Jan Mattsson

Citations in the corpus

• Validating an innovative real-time Delphi approach - A methodological comparison between real-time and conventional Delphi studies (2011, methodology): “Feedback plays a vital role in the Delphi method and is crucial for the survey's success [2,10].”