Validating an innovative real-time Delphi approach - A methodological comparison between real-time and conventional Delphi studies

By Tobias Gnatzy, Johannes Warth, Heiko A. Gracht, Inga-Lena Darkow. 2011

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97ec5b6968cdfdaf4104fc0749e60d651c02025e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. N. Effendi
2. Frank T. Piller
3. Ruth Jiang
4. Robin Kleer
5. Marcello M. Mariani
6. Matteo Borghi

Citations in the corpus

• Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030 (2017, methodology): “The immediate feedback and change of estimates correspond to the several rounds of surveys in a conventional Delphi (Gnatzy et al., 2011).”
• Digital financial literacy, current behavior of saving and spending and its future foresight (2020, methodology): “Following Gnatzy et al. (2011), interquartile interval (IQR) with a threshold of ≤2 is used as a consensus criterion.”