Data Science and its Relationship to Big Data and Data-Driven Decision Making

By Foster J. Provost, Tom Fawcett. Big Data, 2013

1,410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Companies have realized they need to hire data scientists, academic institutions are scrambling to put together data-science programs, and publications are touting data science as a hot—even “sexy”—career choice. However, there is confusion about what exactly data science is, and this confusion could lead to disillusionment as the concept diffuses into meaningless buzz. In this article, we argue that there are good reasons why it has been hard to pin down exactly what is data science. One reason is that data science is intricately intertwined with other important concepts also of growing importance, such as big data and data-driven decision making. Another reason is the natural tendency to associate what a practitioner does with the definition of the practitioner's field; this can result in overlooking the fundamentals of the field. We believe that trying to define the boundaries of data science precisely is not of the utmost importance. We can debate the boundaries of the field in an academic setting, but in order for data science to serve business effectively, it is important (i) to understand its relationships to other important related concepts, and (ii) to begin to identify the fundamental principles underlying data science. Once we embrace (ii), we can much better understand and explain exactly what data science has to offer. Furthermore, only once we embrace (ii) should we be comfortable calling it data science. In this article, we present a perspective that addresses all these concepts. We close by offering, as examples, a partial list of fundamental principles underlying data science.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd1c1d5540f246090e740c0d5a0fa7f2c64059d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Shadi A. Aljawarneh
  2. David Martens
  3. Jessica Clark
  4. Enric Junqué de Fortuny
  5. John Krogstie
  6. Foster J. Provost
  7. Michail N. Giannakos
  8. Ilias O. Pappas

In Management Information Systems

  1. Patrick Mikalef
  2. John Krogstie
  3. Shadi A. Aljawarneh
  4. David Martens
  5. Jessica Clark
  6. Enric Junqué de Fortuny
  7. Marko Robnik-Sikonja
  8. Marko Bohanec

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Enric Junqué de Fortuny
  2. David Martens
  3. Foster J. Provost
  4. Patrick Mikalef
  5. Jessica Clark
  6. John Krogstie
  7. Shadi A. Aljawarneh
  8. Marko Bohanec

Citations in the corpus