Communities of Interest: Learning through the Interaction of Multiple Knowledge Systems
By Gerhard G. Fischer. 2001
319 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcebc88ae606114d4f6919063b082b157bcd31c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Diane J. Schiano
- M. Gumbrecht
- I. Graham
- Linda C. Li
- Camilla Nielsen
- Bonnie A. Nardi
- P. Coyte
- Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Citations in the corpus
- Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models (2017, background): “Many see Web 2.0 technologies in general as having the potential to transform e-learning and traditional teaching methods (Duffy, 2011), while Facebook, in particular, can facilitate the development of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998) and communities of interest (Fischer, 2001).”
- Why we blog (2004, background): “Various electronic media support communities [8], including chat [5, 11], group Web sites [2], listservs [9], and multi-user dimensions (MUDs) and MUD object-oriented technologies (MOOs) [10].”
- Designing for Learning in an Open World (2012, background): “Aggregations of communities of practice are de fi ned by Fischer ( 2001 ) as communities of interest (CoI), which bring together individuals from different communities of practice to solve a problem of shared concern, and they are often more temporary than CoP.”
- Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice (2009, background): “, physicians, researchers, or health care administrators), whereas a community of interest is a 'heterogeneous community' or 'community-of-communities' that mirrors a multidisciplinary team[54].”