Tax incidence in differentiated product oligopoly

By Simon P. Anderson, André de Palma, Brent Kreider. 2000

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb10cfc0db7fa70cf7c1525647f82b9313ec71f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Florian Ederer
2. M. Giné
3. Miguel Antón
4. Martin C. Schmalz
5. A. Hanson
6. Ryan Sullivan

In Marketing

1. Martin C. Schmalz
2. A. Hanson
3. Ryan Sullivan

In Strategy and Management

1. Florian Ederer
2. M. Giné
3. Miguel Antón
4. Martin C. Schmalz
5. A. Hanson
6. Ryan Sullivan

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating Tax Incidence, Market Power and Market Conduct: The European Cigarette Industry (2001, background): “While the potential inapplicability of the theoretical model to Group 2 countries must be acknowledged once more, it is interesting that the estimate of low competitiveness is consistent with a priori expectation given the very high industry concentration in these countries.”
• Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives (2016, background): “(2021b) which is equivalent to λ in Azar (2012) and López and Vives (2019). Values of κij exceeding 1 are possible, but they lead to owners placing more weight on their competitors’ profits than on their own profits.”
• The Incidence of Tobacco Taxation: Evidence from Geographic Micro-Level Data (2008, positive): “22 Anderson, de Palma, and Kreider (2001) also show this result holds if fi rms compete by changing output, or”