Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The “resetting” Effect

By Greg Pogarsky, Alex R. Piquero. 2003

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bca1db797303b24d00f57b70638d0b0119929e25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature (2017, background): “Findings in Sherman and Weisburd (1995) have, to a large extent, been replicated in other places and contexts including the presence of open-air drug markets and “crack houses” (Hope 1994, Weisburd and Green 1995, and Sherman et al.”
Imprisonment and Reoffending (2009, background): “Pogarsky and Piquero (2003) propose the idea of a “resetting” effect to explain this positive association.”
Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, background): “Several other promising pieces of scholarship have recently been advanced to provide insight as to why sanctions work for some offenders under some conditions (Sherman, 1993; Pogarsky and Piquero, 2003).”
Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “That is, “if I was punished now then it is unlikely that I will get caught and be punished again” (Pogarsky & Piquero, 2003).”
Integrating the desire–for–control and rational choice in a corporate crime context (2005, background): “This “re-setting” argument has been found to be important in the context of sanction certainty (Pogarsky & Piquero, 2003).”
Modeling Change in Perceptions about Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory (2004, background): “Pogarsky and Piquero (2003) advanced a ‘‘re-setting’’ hypothesis designed to account for the finding that punishment does not always have the intended effect of deterring the one punished.”
Deterring Delinquents: A Rational Choice Model of Theft and Violence (2006, background): “Consequently, individuals who continuously get away with crime may think they are “due” for an arrest, or those who experience a string of arrests may think they are “due” to get away with crime (Pogarsky and Piquero 2003).”
Deconstructing the Poaching Phenomenon A Review of Typologies for Understanding Illegal Hunting (2014, background): “The phenomenon of defiance has been observed numerous times in criminology (Pogarsky and Piquero 2003; Nurse 2011) but has yet to be explicitly articulated in illegal hunting scholarship (see Filteau 2012; Kahler and Gore 2012, for two times the concept has emerged).”
Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes? (2007, background): “On the other hand, Pogarsky and Piquero (2003) found that individuals updated their sanction risk estimates of drunk driving, but not always in line with the deterrence doctrine.”
Assessing the Impact of First-Time Imprisonment on Offenders’ Subsequent Criminal Career Development: A Matched Samples Comparison (2009, methodology): “Pogarsky and Piquero (2003) propose the idea of a ‘‘resetting’’ effect to explain this positive association.”
Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century (2013, background): “Apospori and Alpert (1993) and Pogarsky and Piquero (2003) report evidence that is the reverse of this prediction.”