Assessing the Impact of First-Time Imprisonment on Offenders’ Subsequent Criminal Career Development: A Matched Samples Comparison

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparing the effects of community service and short-term imprisonment on recidivism: a matched samples approach (2010, background): “3 Various other (quasi-)experimental studies have examined the effects of imprisonment, however, not compared to community service, but to, for example, a fine, prosecutorial waiver, or pardon (see, e.g., Van der Werff 1979; Nieuwbeerta et al. 2009).”
The Impact of Imprisonment on Marriage and Divorce: A Risk Set Matching Approach (2010, background): “Nieuwbeerta et al. (2009) conclude that imprisonment actually exacerbates criminal conviction.”
The Effect of Incarceration on Re-Offending: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Pennsylvania (2013, background): “Studies of the effect of imprisonment on reoffending, including analyses conducted by the authors (Nieuwbeerta, Nagin, and Blokland, 2009; Snodgrass, et al., in press) routinely correct for expose time—time not incarcerated—in calculating rearrest rates or time to rearrest.”
Prisons Do Not Reduce Recidivism (2011, methodology): “Fourth, Nieuwbeerta, Nagin, and Blokland (2009) used data from the Criminal Career and Life-Course Study, which is based in the Netherlands.”