Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century

By Dan Nagin. Crime and justice, 2013

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Peer Influence and Delinquency (2019, background): “Just as Nagin (2013) said there is a need to understand why there is a disjoint between objective sanction risk and perceived risk (e.g., Kleck et al. 2005), there is also a need to understand the conditions under which objective and perceived peer deviance diverge.”
Police Body-Worn Cameras: Effects on Officers’ Burnout and Perceived Organizational Support (2018, background): “Deterrence theory predicts that people are more likely to follow rules and engage in socially acceptable behavior when they think they are being observed (Klepper & Nagin, 1989; Nagin, 2013).”
Can Policing Disorder Reduce Crime? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2015, background): “Deterrence and opportunity theories are usually applied to understand the crime control gains generated by hot spots policing (Braga and Weisburd 2010; Nagin 2013).”
Estimating the Effect of State Zero Tolerance Laws on Exclusionary Discipline, Racial Discipline Gaps, and Student Behavior (2016, background): “Although the efficacy of deterrence-based policies on crime and misbehavior has been questioned, there is some evidence of marginal effects in the criminal justice system broadly and among youth (Nagin, 2013; Paternoster, 2010; Pauwels, Weerman, Bruinsma, & Bernasco, 2011).”