PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION FOR EUROPE: A MULTINATIONAL EIGHT‐COUNTRY EXPLORATION OF CITIZENS’ PERSPECTIVES

By E. Vigoda-Gadot, Aviv Shoham, N. Schwabsky, A. Ruvio. 2008

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc9cc4306b636922c6af17d24ecd863d6a7e377c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Leandro Sepúlveda
2. Fergus Lyon
3. Helena Alves
4. Victor Bekkers
5. Lars Tummers
6. Ian Vickers

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Martin Čepel
2. Leandro Sepúlveda
3. Fergus Lyon
4. E. Ivanová
5. Helena Alves
6. Hanna de Vries
7. Victor Bekkers
8. Lars Tummers

In Public Administration

1. Lars Tummers
2. Leandro Sepúlveda
3. Helena Alves
4. Hanna de Vries
5. Victor Bekkers

Citations in the corpus

• INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA (2016, background): “In general two different dimensions are stressed in the general definitions, which are novelty or the perceiving of newness by the entity adopting the innovation (e.g. Young et al., 2001; Vigoda-Gadot et al., 2008) and the adopting of an idea for the first time by a given organization (e.”
• Co-creation and innovation in public services (2013, background): “…boost citizen satisfaction, generate better outcomes (Bason, 2010), improve the image of the state sector in the perspective of citizens (Bloch et al., 2009; Vigoda-Gadot et al., 2008) and boost innovation in the for-profit sector (Bloch # 2013 Taylor & Francis ∗Email: halves@ubi.pt Vol. 33, Nos.”
• Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing (2017, background): “Healthcare can be theorised as a distributed system with an extensive division of labour and a complex collaborative approach to innovation and the application of useful knowledge (Coombs et al., 2003; Thune and Mina, 2016; Von Hippel, 1988).”
• THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION PERFORMANCE ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE VISEGRAD 4 COUNTRIES (2018, background): “Many research studies deal with measuring competitiveness from different perspectives (e.g. Simionescu et al., 2017; Bánociová & Martinková, 2017; Simionescu, 2016; Calabrese et al., 2013; Vigoda-Gadot et al., 2008).”