The Strengthening of Partisan Affect

By Shanto Iyengar, Masha Krupenkin. 2018

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc4e87eadd583c0e393feaf6a3e9031a3b7bb302

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ro’ee Levy
2. J. Roozenbeek
3. S. van der Linden

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Roozenbeek
2. S. van der Linden
3. Ro’ee Levy
4. Stephan Lewandowsky
5. Thomas Nygren
6. Melisa Basol
7. John Cook
8. J. Reser

Citations in the corpus

• Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation (2019, background): “…emotional language (Aday, 2010; Gross and D’Ambrosio, 2004; Konijn, 2013; Zollo et al., 2015), (3) group polarisation (Groenendyk, 2018; Iyengar and Krupenkin, 2018; Melki and Pickering, 2014; Prior, 2013), (4) floating conspiracy theories (Jolley and Douglas, 2017; Lewandowsky, Gignac, and…”
• Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2020, background): “Affective polarization is a primary outcome of interest since this measure of polarization has been increasing (Gentzkow, 2016; Iyengar and Krupenkin, 2018; Lelkes, 2016), and there are concerns over its implications for governance, accountability of elected officials and even labor markets Iyengar ”