Step Returns in Threshold Public Goods: A Meta- and Experimental Analysis

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Synchrony and Cooperation (2009, unknown): “We tested whether, after behaving in synchrony with others, people would contribute more to a public account in a commons dilemma known as a public-goods game (Croson & Marks, 2000).”
When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory (2007, unknown): “3 A meta-study (e.g., Croson and Marks, 2000, or Zelmer, 2003, for public good”
Dictator games: a meta study (2011, methodology): “meta studies on economic experiments is still fairly limited (Druckman 1994; Harless and Camerer 1994; Croson and Marks 2000 ; Z elmer2003; Huck et al. 2004; Oosterbeek et al. 2004; Blackwell 2007; Engel 2007 ;P rante et al.2007; Jones 2008; Hopfensitz 2009; Percoco and Nijkamp 2009; Weizsacker 201”
Linear Public Goods Experiments: A Meta-Analysis (2003, methodology): “ Croson and Marks (2000) , parameter estimates and other information for these dummy variables are not reported to facilitate interpretation of results.”
The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign (2002, background): “Most notably, more seed money yields considerably more total contributions.”