Ecology and Valuation: Big Changes Needed

By B. Norton, Douglas S. Noonan. 2007

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc319a64103e14ea54ec93bf1fee9b528f9c3274

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Kai Ma Chan
2. U. Pascual
3. G. Wegner
4. Terre Satterfield
5. J. Goldstein
6. H. Wittmer
7. C. Spash
8. Christoph Görg

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Kai Ma Chan
2. U. Pascual
3. G. Wegner
4. Terre Satterfield
5. J. Goldstein
6. C. Spash
7. Christoph Görg
8. H. Wittmer

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. U. Pascual
2. G. Wegner
3. Kai Ma Chan
4. Terre Satterfield
5. J. Goldstein
6. C. Spash
7. K. Jax
8. Alex Y. Lo

Citations in the corpus

• New foundations for ecological economics (2012, background): “Some, who are critical of mainstream economics, remain open to having ecological economists associate with the old conventional framework without realising this is actually detrimental to their desire for the development of a compelling alternative (e.g. Norton and Noonan, 2007).”
• Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “…we do not deny that at high opportunity costs trade-offs may be unavoidable, it is arguable whether such conflicting ethical choices can be properly dealt with through a technocratic approach such as cost-benefit analysis (Martı́nezAlier et al., 1998; Norton and Noonan, 2007; O’Neill et al., 2008).”
• “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, background): “…for more socially engaged and open assessments of ecosystem services (e.g. Cowling et al., 2008; Daily et al., 2009; Menzel and Teng, 2009; Norton and Noonan, 2007; Prager et al., 2012), we investigated this assumption in the context of the PRESS (PEER Research on Ecosystem Services)…”
• The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “New resource economics is then also embedded within free-market ideology and mainstream price theory.”
• How to be an ecological economist (2008, unknown): “I refer those readers e.g. to the book by Baumgärtner et al. (2006: Chapters 1 and 6) and the papers by Becker et al. (2005), Bromley (2007), Gowdy (2007), Norton and Noonan (2007) and Roepke (2005).”
• Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China (2008, background): “…recent studies (Alberini et al., 2005; He et al., 2005; Spash et al., in press; Hougner et al., 2006; Brander et al., 2007; Costanza et al., 2007; Sattout et al., 2007), however, still focus their attention on estimating the value of 0 6465. ang), geying@hzcnc.com ( hed by Elsevier B.V. natural…”
• Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values (2012, background): “…a division of ethical theories between principle-based (deontological) and preference-based (teleological/consequentialist) (March, 1994; Sagoff, 1996, 1998, 2000; Spash, 2000), to which we recognize a third category of virtue-based values (Dean Moore and Russell, 2009; O'Neill et al., 2007).”