New foundations for ecological economics

By C. Spash. 2012

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf2517c691c1795bca61d76805a58dad83e4f904

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
2. R. Muradian
3. I. Scoones
4. H. Ernstson
5. S. Sörlin
6. C. Spash
7. Alex Y. Lo
8. J. Kenter

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
2. R. Muradian
3. I. Scoones
4. H. Ernstson
5. S. Sörlin
6. C. Spash
7. Alex Y. Lo
8. J. Gowdy

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. I. Scoones
2. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
3. H. Ernstson
4. S. Sörlin
5. R. Muradian
6. C. Spash

Citations in the corpus

• Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: On articulating values in urban nature (2013, background): “…of one of the most popular concepts within EnvironmentalEconomicsand Ecological Economics, whichcontributes to calls for wider critical re fl ections (Spash, 2012) on how (e)valuation, knowledge and politics are intertwined, especially at the intersection of ecological complexity and urbanization.”
• The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “So, the pragmatic tendency overrides the deep concern and ends in providing new resource economists with another shallow accountancy tool.”
• In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “…of ideological premises and mental models in shaping the environmental science and policy agendas (e.g. Bromley, 1990; Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010; Spash, 2012) herewe attempt to identify the key assumptions (analytical lens) underlying the way problems and solutions are framed by the perspective…”
• The Politics of Sustainability and Development (2016, background): “Although offering a more ecologically attuned approach, ecological economics too can resort to mechanistic, closed-loop systems thinking, without sufficient attention to nonequilibrium, complexity dynamics and divergent outcomes (19).”
• Waste Picker Organizations and Their Contribution to the Circular Economy: Two Case Studies from a Global South Perspective (2017, background): “with unorthodox ideas of democracy, economy and society [19], and also with non-capitalist political practices [20] belonging to “transition discourses” that call for significant paradigmatic or civilizational transformations [21,22].”